Ever since I started teaching virtual astronomy classes for Christian students, everywhere I travel and also sheight on the topic of astronomy, I satisfy numerous people who ask me what I think around “God’s original names for the constellations.”

Now, to someone who isn’t familiar, that might sound prefer a nonfeeling question, so a small background is required.

You are watching: God named the stars

Could it be that God Himself offered us the names for the stars and also constellations at the beginning of time?

*

The Gospel in the Stars

The concept of “the gospel in the stars” is that God actually called the brightest stars and also significant constellations long, lengthy ago, back in the earliest generations of mankind. He did this to tell an important story: stringing these constellations together, they foretell the message of the gospel.

A comparable alternative theory is that God interacted his setup of redemption to the earliest civilization (to human being like Adam or Seth) and also they named the stars as a witness to this arrangement.

For instance…

Virgo represents the virgin who would offer birth to the promised Messiah.Capricornus represents the goat of atonement, slain for the reconsidered.Orion represents Christ, the heavenly light of the world.Leo is the lion of the tribe of Judah.

…and also so on.

Under this theory, at an early stage huguy cultures construed these original photos in the sky, yet then some time after the Flood, as sinful humale beings spcheck out all over the human being, they attached their very own names to the stars, and also for this reason the pagan techniques of astrology started.

This concept came to be renowned in the late 1800s. Ms. Frances Rolleston’s book, Mazzaroth, publiburned in the 1860s, was the first to propose this theory. Joseph Seiss’s book, The Gospel in the Stars, came out about twenty years later on. E.W. Bullinger’s book, The Witness of the Stars, came out the last decade of the 1ninth century. The concept likewise has a number of modern-day proponents, more than likely the most famed being Dr. D. James Kennedy.

Problems via the Theory

The main trouble via the concept is that we simply cannot go earlier far enough in any historical document to uncover the “original” names of any type of stars or constellations.

From wright here does the concept originate, then?

Seiss and also Bullinger credit Frances Rolleston’s book, Mazzaroth, as containing the original research for the theory. Unfortunately, Rolleston was not an extremely careful scholar when citing or scrutinizing her sources. She also makes some incredibly bold and also entirely unprovable presumptions in her book, making it tough to substantiate her claims.

She assumes Hebrew (the language of the majority of of the Old Testament) is the closest language to that of Adam (which, of course, we don’t know). Based on this assumption, Rolleston looked at Latin star and constellation names (assuming Hebrew is the primitive origin for the Latin language), and then searched the Hebrew language for similar-sounding words (homophones) to discover what the “original” names can have been.Rolleston cites very few of her sources, making it tough to map her steps, and when she does point out her sources, her citations are often vague and imprecise.She often ignores proof that offers simpler or different explanations behind particular star and also constellation names. She picks and also chooses from evidence that will finest fit her concept.

Testing the Theory: Orion

The instance of Orion—an extremely renowned constellation—gives an excellent litmus test for “the gospel in the stars” concept. Let’s look at how Frances Rolleston (and also others who adhered to her) interpreted this constellation.

Orion is a constellation quickly visible in the evening in December, January, February, and March. It includes some of the brightest stars in the night sky, and for this reason, many type of societies roughly the civilization have actually stories associated via these stars.


*

The constellation Orion


First, Rolleston states the Latin name “Orion” is based upon this constellation’s Akkadian name, which indicates “Light of Heaven.” (This, in reality, may be accurate.) Rolleston offers this as a basis to insurance claim Orion was initially supposed to be a symbol of the promised Messiah, based on Matthew 4:16 (“the world dwelling in darkness have seen a good light…”).

2nd, Rolleston claims that while the majority of Greek stories of Orion soptimal of his foot resting on a rablittle, in one ancient Indian star chart, Orion’s foot is stepping on a snake. Based on this, Rolleston claims this additionally confirms this constellation is a photo of Christ, who was prophesied in Genesis to be the one who would certainly involved crush the head of the Satanic serpent (Genesis 3:15).

Third, Rolleston states, in certain mythologies, Orion is stung on the foot by a scorpion, bringing about his fatality, better confirming this constellation’s attach to Genesis 3:15, where God claims to the serpent, “you shall bruise his heel.”

Tright here are a number of major problems through Rolleston’s evidence:

1. Rolleston provides a tremendous leap in evidence, saying that the Akkadian name for Orion must reflect the name God or Adam or some other primordial person offered the constellation. Why single out the Akkadian name among all various other languages? Why assume the Akkadian name is based on a primordial Hebrew name—and also then further assume that it is God who inspired this name?

2. Rolleston cherrypicks the stories that best fit her theory. She ignores the other supernatural stories of Orion’s death that don’t line up with Christ imagery. She dismisses the stories about Orion’s stepping on a rabbit without any warrant.

3. She unjustifiably mixes imagery. Likening Orion’s death by scorpion sting is hardly the very same thing as being harmed by a serpent. Linking these 2 is a stretch at ideal.

4. Many importantly, her interpretation completely runs contrary to both the Bible and Jewish tradition. The constellation Orion is stated in the Scriptures at leastern 3 times (Job 9:9, 38:31; Amos 5:8), using the Hebrew name Kesil (כְּסִיל) definition “Fool.” This is acquired from the same word used in Proverbs nearly 50 times to describe a foolish perboy. This aligns nicely through the Babylonian tradition that identifies the constellation Orion via the character Nimrod (Genesis 10:8), the godless founder of Babel (v.9-10). In various other words, if there was a primordial, divine name for Orion, not only perform the Scriptures not mention this name, they assign a fully different name to it—the Fool—a name very uncoming to be for the Messiah.

For a much more thoturbulent explacountry (and also refutation) of Frances Rolleston’s theories, check out “A More Examicountry of the Gospel in the Stars” by Dr. Danny R. Faulkner from Answers in Genesis.

Is Tright here a Case for Christian Constellations?

The theory of “the gospel in the stars” is attractive to many Christians this particular day. It can serve as an interesting alternate for those who desire to distance themselves from the pagan mythologies connected with the stars.

I, for one, really enjoy finding out what exactly how various cultures assigned various meanings to the constellations. In my online courses, I teach youngsters not only the even more acquainted mythologies of the Greeks and Romans, but also many type of indigenous civilization groups from all over the human being.

Still, some would certainly like constellations have Christian meanings—and also this is an idea that goes back many centuries in church. In the 8th century, the English monk, Venerable Bede, attempted to assign each of the twelve indications of the zodiac to the twelve apostles. During the Redevelopment in Europe, tright here was a motion to rename all the constellations according to biblical themes. An Italian scholar, Ambrosius Fraccus, attempted this in the mid-1500s. A Germale lawyer and also monk, Julius Schiller, publiburned a star atlas in the 1620s referred to as Christian Starry Heavens, wright here he replaced many conventional constellation called with Christian names. Another champion of this principle was the New England also Puritan minister Cotton Mather.

Of course, these recalled Christian constellations were not based upon any type of meant “original” names yet were quite Christianized symbols. Orion became Joseph, father of Jesus. The Argo became Noah’s Ark. Andromeda came to be the tomb of Christ. Hercules became the three Magi. Etc.

Tright here is, of course, nothing wrong via Christians assigning brand-new names to the constellations. Eextremely society on earth has done this, and also there’s nothing wrong via Christian societies assigning names to groups of stars that reflect our very own cheriburned legacies and stories. If tbelow was a nationwide union of Christian astronomers that wanted to gain together and rename constellation teams for the objective of sharing our Christian heritage, I think this is a noble idea.

I doubt, yet, that these new names would ever catch in the culture at big, particularly because the current names of the constellations are currently internationally well-known.

*

How Should Christians Do Astronomy?

Instead of simply trying to “Christianize” the sky, I would certainly a lot quite Christians devote their energies to researching the heavens for the factors God offered us the heavenly lights (Genesis 1:1,14-15):

To give us the rhythm of day and night (examining the climbing and establishing of the sunlight and also its positions in the sky)To give us indications for navigation (studying exactly how to usage the skies for finding our location and offering direction)To mark the seasons of the year (examining exactly how the moon phases and also seasonal constellations aid us to know the rhythms of the year)To assist us make calendars, marking days and also years (examining how the sunlight, moon, and stars assist us to create calendars to organize our stays and also perform history)To give light on the Planet (studying what the heavenly lights are and also how they produce energy that sustains our lives)To glorify God (researching the grandeur of the universe in a method that mirrors the power and also glory of God)

All of these topics and also a entirety lot even more are spanned in my astronomy classes for homeschoolers.

See more: The Roar Of The Greasepaint The Smell Of The Crowd, The Roar Of The Greasepaint

Find Out more around them by clicking “Preview” at the optimal of this page.